Sunday, October 19, 2008

It's a Balancing Act

Since May of last year, a group of 21 students and four sponsers have spent months creating and working on a New Trier production from scratch. Lagniappe Potpourri 2009's Twisted: It's All in Your Head has been the time consuming, grueling, distracting and fantastic theme of my life since last year, and it's almost coming to an end.
By being on board this year, I was able to see the makings of a full plot driven show created from nothing. This experience is important if you're interested in theatre or film, but then I realized it's relevence to American Studies. Lately, we began a unit on Pragmatism and Idealism, and how one needs the other. It is true in government, the idealists need the pragmatists to carry through with their ideas, and pragmatists need idealists for inspiration, but it is also true when creating anything. With Lagniappe, we had many ideas in the beginning for themes of the show. Those on board who created the themes could be labeled as the idealists, but it took the voting and "realistic" look of the pragmatists of the board to make the show come together. When designing a set, lights, or directing, you have big ideas but you need to narrow them down to what is possible and what works. In politics, teaching, party planning, and anything and everything, this balance is apparant. Without pragmatists, idealists would just dream big, and never reach a goal, but without pragmatists, the world wouldnt be able to progress in creativity and inspiration. When this balance is succesful, people are able to achieve their goals. For me and the board of Lagniappe Potpourri 2009, our idealistic and pragmatistic balance has achieved a show with music, dancing, lighting, costuming, programming, and every small detail that a show needs.

3 comments:

Jonny S said...

Nice Bari!

Totally agree with you regarding the idea that pragmatists need idealists and idealists needs pragmatists in order to maintain a secure balance. I liked the connection you made to Lagniappe a lot, and I'm curious to discover if the people who are idealists or pragmatists in the production of Lagniappe are the same way in other aspects of their lives.

Jonny S said...

Nice Bari!

I totally agree with you about how pragmatists and idealists need each other in order to create a secure balance. I also really liked your comparison to Lagniappe; I am curious to discover whether or not the idealists/pragmatists involved in the production of the play are like that in other aspects of their lives.

Cristina Meehan said...

i totall agree and as I commented on your most recent post about the drug issue in Mexico I believe the only thing that can tell if their decision was right is if their balance between pragmatic and ideological thinking was sufficient enough. From the huge decisions of the Mexican government down to the light color choice in a play or the lines written for an actor are truely all rooted from the pragmatic versus ideological thinking. But i believe there are some decisions that need more idealism and less pragmatism and visa versa. In certain incidences there might not be an equal balance but there are hints of both mindsets.